Abraham, and “Obsession”

On September 29, 2009 / By maggi dawn / Reply

The Magnficient Obsession is a new book by Ann Graham Lotz (who is the daughter of famous evangelist Billy Graham)

It tracks the story of Abraham, but rather than locating it as a historical study, Ms Lotz writes of how an in-depth study of Abraham's life changed her own life significantly. She travels through Abraham's story, making connections with her own life,
and writing with some vulnerability about the way in which she makes
the ancient relationship between Abraham and God into a reality in her own life.  Her reflections on what it means to be a friend of God, to be on a Journey with God, to reject the "idolatry of evangelicalism" and to exist primarily for the blessing of others, gives a contemporary take on the relevance of this ancient story for contemporary life.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
Tags: ,

3 Responses to “Abraham, and “Obsession””

Comments

  1. I think there are a number of issues packed in here. When I was a parish priest I could get the CW baptism rite to work Ok in the two buildings where I routinely ministered, but my colleage could not in his. How much is the building a factor?
    I heard Michael Vasey on this when the services came out – he was the chief architect of them remember. His advice was that when leading them you “just need to ham it up”. Certainly the deep drama of these services needs a dramatic leading.
    I thought Ben’s text was interesting – but it begs a question doesn’t it – are we really baptised ‘in the prayers’ of anyone? Aren’t we baptised ‘in the waters of death and new life’? I’m all for flexing CW but we need to keep the theological heart of the rite in view.
    It may well be that we will need to revise CW baptism as many people do find it hard to make it work – it is not just the liturgically unfeeling who struggle! My colleage mentioned above was certainly not litugically inept, though he did eventually become an archdeacon….

  2. Charles I’m interested in the idea that our current liturgy works in certain buildings and not others. For me, it works to a degree in my college chapel, although I always pause to explain what different parts of the liturgy mean, and am always told afterwards “Thank you for explaining it, I had no idea…” which is all very well, but in an already lengthy and verbose service makes it one long recitation. I’ll give it more thought. (Michael Vasey, BTW, was a genius. I wish he was here to ask what we should do next…)

  3. Yes, I think the interface of building and performance is under-researched in liturgy.
    On the verbosity, I used to deal with that in the parish by taking the exhortation which comes after the baptism itself and dividing it between two or three people (Readers, Sunday School leaders et al) – that made it seem less long and verbose!
    We had a baptism at the church I attend today and it did not seem too long – I can’t identify what our vicar did to speed it along though!
    Michael was a genius and a maverick. As you know, I was his successor at Cranmer and I would sometimes (at difficult times in the college’s life) go and stand at his grave in the grounds of the chapel and wonder what he would have done – WWMD??!

Reply