Biblical Illiteracy

On October 23, 2009 / By maggi dawn / Reply

Beth Twiston Davies comments on a subject close to my own heart.

People often assume that you would only read the Bible if you were interested in religion. But without a degree of biblical knowlege, you can't understand Western art, from the earliest known artefacts right through to Banksy and Damien Hirst; you don't get Shakespeare or Chaucer or Milton or Donne, you'll miss all sorts of inferences in contemporary authors like John Stenbeck, Patrick Gale, Salley Vickers…

Amazing amounts of English idiom were coined by the bible translators of the 16th and 17th centuries. 

Go read. It's worth it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
Tags:

4 Responses to “Biblical Illiteracy”

Comments

  1. When I was working in academia, I would have been delighted if they’d just had a dress code to ban shorts – ugh. This level of fuss, though, is way over the top and typically indicative of a management style that is obsessed with measuring trivia and can’t come up with an exit route from a wet paper bag as far as planning the important stuff goes.

  2. Can I commend CrossRefit: http://www.crossref-it.info/?gclid=CMrMoumR050CFeZr4wodG0AitA
    a website which helps English literature students to understand the references which litter(!) exam syllabuses. Designed for A Level students in the UK this has got to be invaluable for anybody studying English literature anywhere in the world. Please pass the link on!

  3. I agree! Perhaps, too, people will see the differences between the Bible and Paradise Lost. :)

  4. I am worried by the number of Christians who don’t know the Bible. During a service with over 100 people present we were asked who had read all of the Bible and only about 6 hands went up. If Christians don’t know, love and explore the Bible how can we expect the rest of the population to read it.

Reply