free speech? or loud-mouth point-scoring males?
Jonathan Freedland in the Guardian gave one of the better accounts of yesterday’s story about civility in blogland. (It’s interesting to me that the particular blogvillages I tend to visit had this conversation at least 2 years ago, applied some old-fashioned principles of manners, and nowadays mostly conduct a pretty well mannered discourse. But anyone who has ever been bothered by trolls, flames, torches etc., will recognise exactly what Freedland is talking about:
"…That’s the beauty of [the blogosphere], say its defenders; an environment of truly free speech. If your ideas cannot withstand the fierce gale of harsh debate, then they’re probably just too flimsy. In one respect, they’re right. Journalists like me have had to raise our game, knowing that a factual lapse will be pointed out within minutes. But that advantage is surely out- weighed by the risk that the blogo-sphere, which could be a new, revolutionary public space, instead becomes a stale, claustrophobic environment, appealing chiefly to a certain kind of aggressive, point-scoring male – and utterly off-putting to everyone else. This is not just bad news for media outlets like the Guardian, keen to build an audience; it means that this great democratic opportunity is lost.
Read the rest here: Guardian Unlimited | Comment is free | The blogosphere risks putting off everyone but point-scoring males.



