Gilead

On June 25, 2009 / By maggi dawn / Reply

In the matter of belief, I have always found that defenses have the same irrelevance about them as the criticisms they are meant to answer. I think the attempt to defend belief can unsettle it, in fact, because there is always and inadequacy in argument about ultimate things. We participate in Being without remainder. No breath, no thought, no wart or whisker, is not as sunk in Being as it could be. And yet no one can say what Being is. If you describe what a thought and a whisker have in common, and a typhoon and a rise in the stock market, excluding existence, which merely restates the fact that they have a place on our list of known and nameable things (and which would yield as insight: being equals existence!), you would have accomplished a wonderful thing, still too partial in an infinite degree to hve any meaning, however.

I've lost my point. It was to the effect that you can assert the existence of something – Being – having not the slightest notion of what it is. Then God is at a greater remove altogether – if God is the Author of Existence, what can it mean to say God exists? There is a problem in vocabulary…

From Gilead, Marilynne Robinson, p 203

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

No Responses to “Gilead”

Comments

  1. I actually cried when I heard the news of her death. Apart from her wonderful poetry, she also said nice things on Poetry Please about my women’s poetry anthology Faith in her Words (which of course included some Fanthorpe).

  2. And although UA should have been the poet laureate, I note that finally a woman has been chosen (after 341 years)…also one with a sharpe sense of humour… Carol Ann Duffy
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/02/world/europe/02poet.html

  3. Oh..I had missed that she was gone. Wonderful woman…wonderful poetry.
    “Right” said the baby “that was roughly what we had in mind”

Reply