is it offensive to promote extra-marital affairs?

On January 25, 2010 / By maggi dawn / Reply

Update to this post: a statement has been received from the website in question - ” We can confirm that we have instructed our agency to have the billboards removed.”  (from JTaylor on Facebook) 27 Jan 2010

A Facebook campaign has been set up to campaign against the public advertising on billboards of a website called marital affair .co.uk. The website is apparently a “dating” site for married people who want a bit of uncommitted fun on the side. The Facebook campaign seems to be supported by a lot of Christians, although it apparently wasn’t launched as a religious statement, simply one that objected to the deliberate sabotaging of faithful relationships. The person who started the campaign against the website wrote to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) and received a reply that said – in a nutshell – it’s not deemed offensive, so we are not going to do anything about it. It seems utterly bizarre to me that complaints about lingerie adverts can be upheld, and yet it’s apparently considered “not offensive” to have an affair dating site promoted publicly. I think it is deeply offensive, and have also submitted a complaint to the ASA.

I can’t help seeing a strange lateral connection here. David Cameron has recently suggested that married people should get tax breaks, on the other hand it’s apparently OK to allow a public advertising campaign to set up affairs for people.
Let me clarify what I mean.  A democracy is supposed to be the best system in the world – and I wouldn’t want to swap it for the other options. But its success and longevity, it seems to me, depends upon the people who live in it maintaining some kind of moral compass, so that we don’t end up with such a laissez-faire attitude that anything goes. Of course we’ll disagree about what is right or wrong, but we should keep arguing about it. If anything goes, without anything ever being questioned, then everything will fall apart and we’ll lose the freedoms we take for granted. It’s not Mr Cameron’s fault that the ad is up there – that’s not what I mean. But it will do our society deep damage if we stand by and say nothing. The possibility seems to hang in the air that we would end up with a society that apparently thinks it’s OK to stay “married” and pick up the cash, while doing whatever you like on the side. And the effect will be far greater, I think, than just a few marriages going under.

It doesn’t seem to me to have anything to do with religion, it’s just common decency not to want to have a society like that.

Read the rest on facebook, and sign up to the page if you like. and go to the ASA site and submit a complaint of your own. Or read on – I’ve reproduced it below.

The website maritalaffair.co.uk has started advertising on billboards around the country. The website describes itself as ‘delivering a dating arena for extra-marital affairs’ for ‘uncomplicated adult fun’. It directly promotes and faciliates people being unfaithful to their partners, and their families and children.

Please write to the ASA on-line at www.asa.org.uk to complain about maritalaffair.co.uk advertising in the UK. You can quote the reference number of my complaint – A10-115873/JD and write in favour of my complaint.

I complained last week about a large billboard advertisement for the website in Merton (just outside the Tandem Centre on the corner of Tandem Way and Christ Church Rd). I wrote to both Merton Council and the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). Merton Council told me that it could not do anything about it (I have now written to their Chief Executive and await a reply).

The ASA replied yesterday to tell me that they rejected my complaint. They said ‘We can only act if the ad, in our judgement, offends against widely accepted moral, social or cultural standards.’ They went on to say that they did not feel the ad was offensive because it was ‘unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence or be seen as irresponsible.’

When you think of the trauma and suffering caused to individuals and communities by the damage of affairs and the breakdown of relationships they cause I can’t think of anything more irresponsible that could be advertised. The site is completely without any scruples other than making money – they are feeding on people’s weaknesses and helping them to lie and ruin their own as well as their partners, and their families and children’s lives. Sites like these will always exist but we do not have to tolerate their advertising in public places.

(I know some people will say that campaigning against it only raises the profile but being on the internet is one thing – but why should my kids be introduced to concepts like this being promoted publicly – they see enough of the tragic consequences of marriage breakdown enough as it is)

The full text of the ASA response is reproduced it below:

Dear Mr Kuhrt

Your complaint about Maritalaffair.co.uk

Thank you for contacting the Advertising Standards Authority. I am sorry that this ad has caused you offence.

I should say right at the start that the ASA Council has considered complaints about ads for this product in the past but didn’t think there were sufficient grounds for us to intervene. Let me explain.

Our Code says that ads should contain nothing that is likely to cause serious or widespread offence. The ASA bases its judgments on the content of the ad and the medium, audience, product type and prevailing standards in society.

Complaints about offence often require difficult judgements but we don’t intervene where advertising is simply criticised for being in poor taste. Apart from freedom of speech considerations, even well-intentioned and thoughtful people will have different and sometimes contradictory opinions about what constitutes ‘bad taste’ or should be prohibited. We can only act if the ad, in our judgement, offends against widely accepted moral, social or cultural standards.

In this case, we didn’t think the advertising was likely to have those effects because Council felt that whilst not everyone will agree with the advertiser’s service, the poster’s content and presentation were not explicit and it was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence or be seen as irresponsible.

I realise this decision will disappoint you but the advertisers have been informed of public response to their ads. And we’ll continue to monitor the response to this campaign.

Our website, www. asa.org.uk, contains information about the ASA and the work we do, including the results of investigations into other complaints, many of which have been upheld.

Yours sincerely

Julia Dean
Complaints Executive
juliad [at] asa.org.uk

See also: Dave Walker at ChurchTimes

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

12 Responses to “is it offensive to promote extra-marital affairs?”

Comments

  1. Michael Hauser

    Unfortunately, fidelity and self-control appear to be qualities that are rapidly disappearing. Marriage vows now appear to be meaningless. Promises are broken and morality has gone into hiding. It’s a shame that this is happening.

  2. Kneewax

    A sad indicator of our times I fear, I am not sure what can be done if the ASA won’t intervene. Like you I do not want a society with these double standards but I am not sure I get the David Cameron reference (here or in your tweet stream) – this website is not a Conservative Party initiative is it? Did the Tories promote it? Are they in government and have the power tell the ASA to pull it?

    I am not suggesting you hold back criticism of any party when they deserve it (and all the parties do) – but your attack here seems a little unfair…

  3. I don’t think I would even bring “offense” into it. It’s not so much offensive as mean and irresponsible. It’s an encouragement to lie, cheat, abuse and hurt other people (that we happen to be in a legal and moral contract with).

  4. Rhys

    yes it is offensive to promote it (ie the idea of extra marital affairs) but the ASA can only take action if the advertisement is offensive – a fine line but then aren’t they all?
    You see advertisements for premium rate offensive phonelines in loads of newspapers and magazines – offensive service but is the ad? I make my choice by not ringing them. Not difficult – just dont use them. Campaign like this – ie the letter and the facebook campaign merely give free publicity to the company promoting the service. Better to send a donation to RELATE asking them to take out Billboard adverts?

  5. It doesn’t seem that the ASA is the right way to complain about this, unfortunately. As they say, they are not able to deal with complaints that are inherantly about the product or service being advertised.

    I would think, in this case, it might be better for us to write to local councils and MPs. This seems to be a much wider question than a couple of billboard ads, and I would want to question whether such a site is even legal, in that it actively encourages activities that can lead directly to divorce (or ‘breach of contract’, if you like), since adultry is considered (rightly, IMO) just grounds for divorce.

  6. maggi dawn

    you’re right, and I didn’t explain well enough what I meant – it’s not Mr Cameron’s fault, I’m sure he’d be disgusted by it. I’ve added a paragraph above to clarify a bit better what I’m driving at. thanks, kneewax

Pingbacks and Trackbacks

Reply