reading the bible is like flat hunting
Here’s an interesting analogy for interpreting the Bible:
One of my lecturers has used the analogy of a young couple looking to
rent a flat to describe the dilemma. There is a tension between the
original state of the property as the lease agreement was signed, and
the degree to which the couple may alter the flat to make it their own.
A subjective reading of the OT takes the view of the tenant, but when
does the re-decorating of the original become a distortion and not an
enhancement. A more objective reading would take the view of the
landlord; that the apartment should stay as originally designed without
any alterations or modifications, leaving the tenants without a homely
environment.
hat tip to Jon




Isn’t it a bit more like a tent that has to be reassembled repeatedly wherever you are, conscious of the need for the right bit of clearing to pitch on. You have to use all the bits that are available but never in the same order and some bits can be interchangeable…And the tent’s never quite like home. If it’s too comfortable, you’re not really camping…
Deryck Sherriffs in his epic ‘The Friendship of the Lord: Spirituality of the Old Testament’ devotes the first chapter to this hermeneutical analogy. It’s getting harder to find the book but it’s possibly the most helpful I’ve found on OT spirituality and how he unpacks this metaphor is beautiful.
One of the increasing tensions in OT readings is between text, however interpreted, and history. New evidence from digs has raised questions concerning some of the OT’s most siginificant events. It would seem that at least in US scholarly quarters that the OT is increasingly treated as a composite narrative. Story seems to increasingly be the interprative focus. This would suggest that the ’surface’of the text is the center of gravity, but the meaning is perhaps more in the readers mind than the authors intention.
I think a large problem with the Bible has been many people treat it like they would treat a novel or a newspaper; you can maybe read it for 15 minutes, and if not, you toss it and read something simpler.
The great works of literature require patience and time to read and understand, and the Bible is no different. The Bible contains many layers of meaning and this is why great Christian thinkers in the past have read it in several ways. Generally Christian thinkers have prayed for Christ, the Logos, to enlighten the mind and to guide it in wisdom in uncovering the meaning. The monastic tradition is especially interesting in this regard, since monks and nuns learned to incorporate the bible into life as one of the symbols of God’s prescence.
One thing people forget is the need for God, who himself is incomprehensible in his own essence to anyone in this life, mediates himself to us by symbols. The use of symbolism and creative art to make appropriate symbols for invisible spiritual realities then has always been very important, and we can see the beauty which is formed from the icons in the Orthodox Church to Dante’s poems to the works of art in the Basilica in Rome. Many Christian thinkers liked to say there are two books for us to learn from about God; the book of nature (which shows God’s glory) and the word of God itself, the Bible.
In terms of numinous power, becoming spiritual is learning to see all things in terms of their sacredness because they participate in the goodness of God and creation. The Bible helps us in this, provided we carry the same sense of sacredness and holiness to places outside of the Bible and the Church.