<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maggi Dawn &#187; church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maggidawn.com/tag/church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maggidawn.com</link>
	<description>Author, musician and theologian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:05:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Regeneration: Young people and the Church</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/regeneration-young-people-and-the-church/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/regeneration-young-people-and-the-church/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReGeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Adults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/?p=4272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like it better if we could say &#8220;Young people ARE the Church.&#8221; It&#8217;s one of the greatest failings of the biggest institutional churches (and mine is one of the worst at this) that we treat young people as if they are customers, not members. Always being provided for but never being asked to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like it better if we could say &#8220;Young people ARE the Church.&#8221; It&#8217;s one of the greatest failings of the biggest institutional churches (and mine is one of the worst at this) that we treat young people as if they are customers, not members. Always being provided for but never being asked to shoulder responsibility or make decisions. No wonder they wander away. They&#8217;ll be bored of being told what&#8217;s good for them instead of being asked.</p>
<p>The wonderful Mark Russell has decided to do something about it. ReGeneration proposes to get the crusty old Bishops (and probably the few young-ish ones too) to listen to young people. Bring it on.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.regenerationsummit.org/">ReGeneration is here. Sign up.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/regeneration-young-people-and-the-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>is the institutional Church an out-moded organisational technology?</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/is-the-institutional-church-an-out-moded-organisational-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/is-the-institutional-church-an-out-moded-organisational-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liturgy and worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/?p=3954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come and join me, Kester Brewin, Jonny Baker and Ian Mobsby for a discussion on the future shape of church.
Date: 15th September
Venue: The Betsey Trotwood, 56 Farringdon Road
Time: 7:30pm
Cost: free!
Kester writes: &#8220;In the light of the scandals surrounding the Catholic church, and the decline in church attendance over the past decades, has the classic model [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come and join me, Kester Brewin, Jonny Baker and Ian Mobsby for a discussion on the future shape of church.</p>
<p>Date: 15th September<br />
Venue: The Betsey Trotwood, 56 Farringdon Road<br />
Time: 7:30pm<br />
Cost: free!</p>
<p>Kester writes: &#8220;In the light of the scandals surrounding the Catholic church, and the decline in church attendance over the past decades, has the classic model of the institution had its day?  Is institutional Christianity an outmoded organisational technology – slow, heavy-weight and rigid – and are there new, more light-weight and adaptable ‘skins’ that provide a more flexible and adaptable service… or is the move towards a more fluid, ‘TAZ’ Christianity no more than a flash(mob) in the pan, lacking substance or ground for genuine action?&#8221;</p>
<p>Kester, Jonny Baker, Ian Mobsby and I will be in debate on these questions &#8211; and you too if you&#8217;d like to come along. The venue is a couple of tube stops from King&#8217;s Cross so easy to reach from Cambridge. If you are going from cambridge let me know and we can meet up on the train.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/is-the-institutional-church-an-out-moded-organisational-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>women priests equated with child abusers&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/women-priests-equated-with-child-abusers/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/women-priests-equated-with-child-abusers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bishops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/?p=3824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is bizarre in the extreme&#8230;
more on the story from Andrew Brown
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1002827.htm">this is bizarre in the extreme&#8230;</a></p>
<p>more on the story from <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/andrewbrown/2010/jul/14/religion-feminism-vatican">Andrew Brown</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/women-priests-equated-with-child-abusers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitregate: the follow up</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/mitregate-the-follow-up/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/mitregate-the-follow-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katharine Jefferts Schori]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitregate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/?p=3661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The posts of the last few days have been a tad on the serious side. Thank you for all the comments and thoughts. For a cheering up post, here is a blog, devoted to recording the consecrations of women to the episcopate, which rejoices in the marvellous title Chicks In Pointy Hats. 
And here, an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The posts of the last few days have been a tad on the serious side. Thank you for all the comments and thoughts. For a cheering up post, here is a blog, devoted to recording the consecrations of women to the episcopate, which rejoices in the marvellous title <a href="http://chicksinpointyhats.blogspot.com/">Chicks In Pointy Hats. </a></p>
<p>And here, an entire <a href="http://kjsfanpage.blogspot.com/">fan-blog for the Presiding Bishop</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/mitregate-the-follow-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>women, bishops and synod</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/women-bishops-and-synod/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/women-bishops-and-synod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bishops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/?p=3532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next month sees the proposals drawn up by the revision go back to Synod for its revision stage. The simplest way forward would be a single clause measure, which would enable us to have women in the Episcopate without any discrimination at all. But the revision committee has listened closely and carefully to all points [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next month sees the proposals drawn up by the revision go back to Synod for its revision stage. The simplest way forward would be a single clause measure, which would enable us to have women in the Episcopate without any discrimination at all. But the revision committee has listened closely and carefully to all points of view, and compromises have been made in their proposals to attempt to hold differing views together.</p>
<p>It seems there is a broad consensus that the proposals are good, although there are also a few vocal and determined detractors. The debate is no doubt going to be intense at Synod this time round. But it must, surely, be time to move forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/women-bishops-and-synod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you comfortable in church (is it too &#8216;feminine&#8217;)?</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/are-you-comfortable-in-church-is-it-too-feminine/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/are-you-comfortable-in-church-is-it-too-feminine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 07:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church Mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sorted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/?p=3399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Church Mouse covered the Sorted survey the other day, which suggested that men are &#8216;less comfortable in Church than in a lingerie department&#8217;. Today, Mouse has unearthed some more detail from Christian Research, who organised the survey, and the even more interesting piece of information is that less than half of people who say [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://churchmousepublishing.blogspot.com/2010/05/new-survey-men-more-comfortable-in.html">The Church Mouse covered the Sorted survey the other day</a>, which suggested that men are &#8216;less comfortable in Church than in a lingerie department&#8217;. <a href="http://churchmousepublishing.blogspot.com/2010/05/more-on-men-church-survey-details-not.html">Today, Mouse has unearthed</a> some more detail from Christian Research, who organised the survey, and the even more interesting piece of information is that less than half of people who say they are Christians feel comfortable in church &#8211; and, startlingly, only 14-15% of Christian men aged between 18 and 34 feel comfortable in Church. </p>
<p>Mouse hits the nail on the head when he says &#8220;if we can&#8217;t create a church in which Christians feel comfortable, we really do have some serious questions to ask about how we expect anyone else to feel comfortable there.&#8221; </p>
<p>I agree with Mouse &#8211; and a further point would be to ask how comfortable women feel in church. DIscovfering that men don&#8217;t feel comfortable could lead to the easy asumption that Church is too feminine/shouldn&#8217;t be run by women/is what women like &#8211; but why assume that? Maybe women don&#8217;t feel comfortable either &#8211; maybe we are all putting up with something we don&#8217;t like very much. Do women like church? are they more religious than men? or are they just more willing to put up with not feeling comfortable? </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t count the number of times I&#8217;ve heard a woman say to me &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t go to this church if it was just me, but the kids&#8217; work is great, so that&#8217;s why I stick around&#8221;. That&#8217;s only anecdotal of course; it would be interesting to find out more. It would be even more interesting to find out what we could do to make Church interesting and appealing, instead of cringey, awkward or boring to the majority of people. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m put in mind of Jesus&#8217; followers (men and women) who certainly went to synagogue regularly but who spend most of their time taking boat trips, going fishing, taking amazingly long walks, having huge picnics, visiting people in their homes, eating and drinking &#8220;with sinners&#8221; (down the pub?)&#8230; </p>
<p><a href="http://churchmousepublishing.blogspot.com/2010/05/more-on-men-church-survey-details-not.html">Go to Mouse&#8217;s latest post to read the rest of the stats and some good comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/are-you-comfortable-in-church-is-it-too-feminine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church: what would you vote for?</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/church-what-would-you-vote-for/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/church-what-would-you-vote-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 12:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barry taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/?p=3379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the general election and the apparent shift in British politics, Barry Taylor writes: 
I wish there was a way churches could be &#8216;forced&#8217; to rethink how they do what they do&#8211;the vote in religious worlds is demonstrated by the feet&#8211;people leave, but it would be very cool if there were ways for communities to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the general election and the apparent shift in British politics, <a href="http://superflat.typepad.com/nevermindthebricolage/2010/05/the-new-faces.html">Barry Taylor writes: </a></p>
<blockquote><p>I wish there was a way churches could be &#8216;forced&#8217; to rethink how they do what they do&#8211;the vote in religious worlds is demonstrated by the feet&#8211;people leave, but it would be very cool if there were ways for communities to challenge the ways things are done in the some way as this election seems to have done.</p></blockquote>
<p>If we could vote for the lines to be redrawn in Church, what would you include in your manifesto?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/church-what-would-you-vote-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>facebook is a religion?</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/facebook-is-a-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/facebook-is-a-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/facebook-is-a-religion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Meynell writes about &#8220;the church of facebook&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://markmeynell.wordpress.com/2010/03/15/making-connections-jesse-rices-church-of-facebook/">Mark Meynell writes</a> about &#8220;the church of facebook&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/facebook-is-a-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women submit to your husbands</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/women-submit-to-your-husbands/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/women-submit-to-your-husbands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women bishops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/?p=2937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I missed this story in the Telegraph a few days ago (not my paper of choice) until I read it via The Church Mouse.
Two clergymen in Kent are preaching not only the old chestnut that  women should be silent in church and submit to their hubands &#8220;because the Bible says so&#8221;, but even that divorce [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/7221802/Vicar-tells-women-to-submit-to-husbands.html">this story in the Telegraph</a> a few days ago (not my paper of choice) until I read it via <a href="http://churchmousepublishing.blogspot.com/2010/02/woman-teaches-men-that-they-should-not.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheChurchMouse+%28The+Church+Mouse%29">The Church Mouse.</a></p>
<p>Two clergymen in Kent are preaching not only the old chestnut that  women should be silent in church and submit to their hubands &#8220;because the Bible says so&#8221;, but even that divorce is the woman&#8217;s fault! (And where does it say that in the Bible, I ask? yep &#8211; nowhere at all)  The more junior of the two clergymen has apparently said in his sermon that the rise in the divorce rate is due to the behaviour of women. (Never to mens behaviour? Or to economics, or education, or a culture that &#8211; thank God &#8211; no longer believes that a woman is the property of her father or her husband?)</p>
<p>The lines of argument being rehearsed in this Kent Church have proved so offensive that women are leaving the Parish church (good decision) and cancelling their financial support. Offensive, yes, but also risible for their total lack of logic. What are single women to do in Church? (With no husband to submit to, and no husband to speak on her behalf, is she to be returned to being a chattel among her father&#8217;s property?) And even more illogical &#8211; as Mouse has found out &#8211; the leaflet accompanying this line of teaching was <strong><em>written by a woman!!</em></strong> This part isn&#8217;t offensive, it&#8217;s just laugh-out-loud stupid. Get the rest of the skinny from <a href="http://churchmousepublishing.blogspot.com/2010/02/woman-teaches-men-that-they-should-not.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheChurchMouse+%28The+Church+Mouse%29">Church Mouse: Woman teaches men that they should not be taught by a woman</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/women-submit-to-your-husbands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Church and New Media</title>
		<link>http://maggidawn.com/the-church-and-new-media/</link>
		<comments>http://maggidawn.com/the-church-and-new-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggi dawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggidawn.com/?p=2722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conference I was on this week was quite wonderful. The theme was beauty, but around the edge of that a variety of other questions emerged. One of them was a new version of what might sound to some like &#8220;an old chestnut&#8221; &#8211; except that it does genuinely bother people, and is therefore, to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conference I was on this week was quite wonderful. The theme was beauty, but around the edge of that a variety of other questions emerged. One of them was a new version of what might sound to some like &#8220;an old chestnut&#8221; &#8211; except that it does genuinely bother people, and is therefore, to my mind, an important question: the concern that people (especially the &#8220;younger generation&#8221;)  who spend a lot of time using facebook, blogs, twitter, email, texting, etc. etc. are ceasing to have the ability to communicate with real people.</p>
<p>The extremes of the argument were there &#8211; on the one hand, being in touch online isn&#8217;t &#8220;real&#8221;, on the other hand, it&#8217;s better for a teenager to be in touch with likeminded people online than to sulk alone in their room.</p>
<p>I agreed with elements on both sides of the argument. I agree that however &#8220;in touch&#8221; you might be via a screen or a portable device, it isn&#8217;t the same as, and doesn&#8217;t replace, the quality of interaction when you sit down and look someone in the eye while you are talking to them. I also agree that new media is a brilliant tool for connecting with people who are too far away to see face to face.</p>
<p>I pondered the fact that during the 50 hour conference, I had spent a large number of hours talking face to face, quite a lot writing with a pen on old-fashoned paper, but also tweeted some of the bits of wisdom that were emerging.</p>
<p>It also occurred to me that before we had new media, people didn&#8217;t always sit across the table concentrating on each other &#8211; how many conversations of childhood can you remember when someone had a half-focussed conversation with you while hidden behind the newspaper?</p>
<p>Church Mouse has a good interview up today with a &#8220;new media&#8221; officer., which explores some of these ideas further Here&#8217;s a clip:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong> <em>Do you have to be a geek to use new media?</em></strong><em><br />
&#8230; no, you don’t have to be a geek&#8230; I think all you need to use new media is an open mind, and to come to terms with the fact that you really know nothing. Saying you need to be a geek to use new media is like saying you need to be a mathematician to run a bank. It might help, but it’s not essential. Apparently.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://churchmousepublishing.blogspot.com/2010/01/church-and-new-media-interview-with-sam.html">Read the rest here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggidawn.com/the-church-and-new-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
